With the “Celtic or Bell Beaker” migrations. BC, in the course of the “killingįields” period and migrations, Europe was largely re-populatedīy Kurgan people, marked by R1b haplogroup, who came overland in “Kurgan waves”, and circum-Mediterranean Opposite, the science, and the Eurocentric science particularly, routinely discounted directĮyewitness evidence, take the geocentric universe, war and peace reports, and certified genealogicalĪrcheology and genetics have determined that in the 3rd mill. Science is resting on indirect evidence, and not eyewitness provides our knowledge. Will not impact the flow of history, and mistakes do not affect the vision. Intellectual inertia, the destroyed evidence is not about to resurface, changing presentation style Unconventional, arguments are not developed sufficiently, and there are mistakes. The sources are not direct, evidence is circumstantial, the style is uncouth, the layout is Taken uncritically, some of them are addressed in the posting annotations.įor the Eurocentric scholars, the book is polarizing and unconvincing on many technical grounds: Speculations and wanton postulations, an even larger body outside of the author's purview has been Very few boys from the crowds deign to scream that the king is naked. The whole book is essentially a summary,Ī comparable volume of endnotes provides details without cluttering the subject, and ensuring aįascinating reading. The Inner Asian and nomadic world understand much less. In grasping European affairs, and yet in grasping As any re-evaluation, the book modifiesĮxtant esthesis, relying on the store of accumulated scientific and largely Eurocentric works that
Of cultural, ethnological, etiologic, and technical matters. The politics addressed in the book is but a tip of an iceberg that tops a whole body Of creative change that reshaped the face and innards of the Classical Europe, and served as a ladder to The Dark Age was far from being dark, it was the age The new China was also createdīy Zhou Scythians, who preceded Huns by 12 centuries. In creating a new Europe where these scholars live now, and a new India.
They not only did not vanish, they were instrumental Under Eurocentric scheme, the Huns disappeared. It addresses fundamentals, andĭemonstrates that they are unsustainable. The Hyun Jin Kim's book rolls back the 15 centuries-long inane trend. But so far, no Sinocentric or Eurocentric writer ventured to deal squarely with For specific topics, an alternate Eurasian perspective started That was not helpful neither for the European nor for for outside history, propagating false In conceptualizing their own histories much of the outside worksĮurocentric version as a creed. On glorification of farming and outdated notions of nomadic culture as primitive in comparison to sedentary civilizations, remained unquestionable inside and outside of the European science. On the fringes, individual aspects were disputed, but for 15 centuries the theme, rooted The slant colors entire view, in extreme formsīurning people alive and cheating allies is expected civilized behavior, while pillaging as punishment isīarbaric. Parochial perspective in tune with the parochial interests of the audience. Themselves as the ones civilized versus the bulk of the others, and traditionally had The victors, since at one time all locals were victors and losers, but because the locals held Throughout the world, and practically it is the only item on the menu. The Eurocentric view of the European history is ingrained not only in Europe, it resonates On Hunnic and Turkic (snippets)Ĭambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013, ISBN 978-6-6 Hyun Jin Kim - Huns in Europe - TurkicWorld Homeĭoerfer G.
0 kommentar(er)
